U.S. Increases Nuclear Energy Spending as It Fights Global Weapons Ban
-
Watch this video:
7 years ago
In the belief that the truth shall set us free. . .
"When we talk about it, people may think we are overreacting. But in fact the environmental catastrophe that we inherited in Iraq is even worse than it sounds."
"Traces of uranium" found at bombed Syrian plant
My first thought at seeing that headline was: "depleted uranium."
It's truly a crime that our outgoing administration somehow is escaping all accountability as it waltzes out the door. They are getting away with this horror of irradiating a population in Iraq that posed no threat to us and had been systematically weakened by ten years of sanctions, supposedly directed against their leaders. Now the displaced truly have no home to which to return, no water to safely drink, etc., because of lingering radiation. (Of course our civilian contractors supply safe water, etc., to the occupying "warfighters.")
All this lasting destruction thanks to us. Some legacy. I have no reason to doubt that the arms we give or "sell" to Israel are just as "advanced" and were used against the Syrian installation they destroyed and probably stand ready for use anywhere else in the region they decide to strike. Hence the "traces of uranium" which scientists will no doubt find a way to construe as evidence that the Syrian plant was bent on nefarious (nuclear) ends.
I may be proud to live in a free country, but I am not repeat not proud of the mark the U.S. is making on this planet and the ruin we are wreaking in the lives of countless humans and uncounted ecosystems.
Note to Barbara -- requesting clarification
In your first listed point of information:
'Depleted uranium, the nuclear waste of uranium enrichment, is not actually "depleted" of radiation; 99.3% of it is Uranium238, which still emits radioactive alpha particles at the rate 12,400/second, with an estimated half life of 4.5 billion years.'
For "12,400/second" to be meaningful, it should be per given unit of mass (weight): for example, alpha particles 12,400/second/kg or whatever. I am unable to find the factor and hope your research will turn it up.
In fact, that "per weight" factor will turn out to be rather high, because with such a long half-life the radiation is fairly low-level. This in NO way diminishes the hazard of exposure to this material or the criminality of its continued use in weapons, whether against civilian or military populations.
Thank you -- the editor person
From Me (BBT):Dr. Rosalie Bertell
Here is the article full of excellent information by Dr. Rosalie Bertell written for the May 1999 Hague Peace Conference, entitled "Gulf War Veterans and Depleted Uranium" from which I got those specific statistics: http://www.ccnr.org/du_hague.html.
The point is that the public is fooled by the term "depleted", which generally means "empty", which seems to indicate that it is harmless.
Similarly, the term "low-level radiation" results in another misconception. I am not a scientist, but I do understand that 12,400 emissions per second indicates a great deal of blasting. It turns out that the term "low-level" refers to the size of the distance the emission travels, not the power of the blast.
While I may be able to stand a few feet away from a chunk of depleted uranium and not be affected by it, because the emissions don't reach me, if instead there is a particle of it in my body, the cells that are next to that particle that is working its way through the gastrointestinal or respiratory system, for example, are being constantly bombarded, and change as a result.
For the universe of my body, there is nothing low-level about the experience.
Thank you for asking for more clarification. I hope this helps.
Thank you for clarifying
The article for which you posted a link helped enormously, and I hope everyone reads it.
The portion that clarified the statistic for me is this paragraph:
"Natural uranium in soil is about 1 to 3 parts per million, whereas in uranium ore it is about 1,000 times more concentrated, reaching about 0.05 to 0.2 percent of the total weight. Depleted uranium concentrate is almost 100 percent uranium. More than 99 percent of both natural and depleted uranium consists of the isotope U-238. One gram of pure U-238 has a specific activity of 12.4 kBq, which means there are 12,400 atomic transformations every second, each of which releases an energetic alpha particle. Uranium 238 has a half life of 4.51 E+9 (or 4.51 times 10 to the 9th power, equivalent to 4,510,000,000 years)."
So the emission rate is 12,400 per second per gram of U-238, much more than I realized. And even though they are low-energy (velocity) alpha particles (helium nuclei, two protons with two neutrons), they are massive and do considerable subatomic damage when they do strike -- as do ingested particles of this material, no matter how small.
Especially enlightening was the section a bit later in the article was the treatment of decay products, one kind after another decaying into further radioactive isotopes. The final resting stage of this process is atoms of lead, which noboty wants in their system.
Thanks again for raising this terribly important issue.
From Me (BBT):My Thanks for Your Follow Through
It is that concern to really know what's being said, so you, too, can consider its meaning and what you can do about it, that encourages me.
More important, it creates the public dialogue which is so profoundly called for, so we can put an end to the use of depleted uranium in weaponry.
Thank you.
Writing about DU
I should mention that I first learned about depleted uranium on Memorial Day 2005. It took me more than a year and a half to dare to post anything anywhere about it, but during that time I gathered a ton of articles and reports, so when I did finally say something, I could back it up.
Some people who write about Depleted Uranium are so frustrated (understandably) that they let their need to be heard outshine the facts, and those who want this embarrassing and potentially expensive liability silenced are ready and willing to jump on that weakness.
I've been pleased that my presentation of the essentials has been reviewed and confirmed by two of the top experts in the field. Phew.
It is a sad tale, but it must be faced.
I noticed that this article has been picked up and posted on a blog.
When I visited the blog, there he was, that retired Lt. Col. Roger Helbig I mentioned in the article, to criticize the blogger for posting "lies about depleted uranium", saying that no one ever reads the referenced reports.
So, I wonder, did Helbig actually read the article? Does he actually criticize an article that points out that he may show up to criticize it?
We are the deciders. And every single day, every single one of us needs to step outside and take some action to help stop this war.
Raise hell.
Think of something to make the ridiculous look ridiculous.
Make our troops know we're for them and trying to get them out of there.
Hit the streets to protest Bush's proposed surge.
If you can, go to the peace march in Washington on January 27.
We need people in the streets, banging pots and pans and demanding, "Stop it, now!"